human rab25 (Bio-Rad)
Structured Review

Human Rab25, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/human rab25/product/Bio-Rad
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "In Vivo Base Editing Rescues Hutchinson-Gilford Progeria Syndrome in Mice"
Article Title: In Vivo Base Editing Rescues Hutchinson-Gilford Progeria Syndrome in Mice
Journal: Nature
doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-03086-7
Figure Legend Snippet: ( a ) Distribution of all possible single-nucleotide variant (SNV) types in non-tumor liver tissue and liver tumor tissue samples isolated from ABE AAV9-injected and saline-injected mice. Values from individual tissue samples are shown on the left. Aggregated values from all AAV-injected mouse tumor tissue samples, all AAV-injected mouse liver tissue samples, and all saline-injected mouse liver tissue samples are shown on the right, where values represent the mean of each sample type and error bars reflect the standard deviation with each tissue section treated as a different sample: AAV-injected tumor tissue (n=7), AAV-injected liver tissue (n=6), and saline-injected liver tissue (n=2). ( b ) Genomic classification of A•T-to-G•C SNVs. Values from individual tissue samples are shown on the left. Aggregated values from AAV-injected mouse tumor tissue samples, AAV-injected mouse liver tissue samples, and saline-injected mouse liver tissue samples from all tissue types are shown on the right, where values represent the mean of each sample type and error bars reflect the standard deviation with each tissue section treated as a different sample: AAV-injected tumor tissue (n=7), AAV-injected liver tissue (n=6), saline-injected liver tissue (n=2). ( c ) A•T-to-G•C SNVs and indels found in or near genes that are recurrently mutated in human liver cancers , including introns, exons, and at ATAC-seq-defined cis-regulatory regions within 100-kb of each gene’s transcription start site, in AAV-injected mouse tumor tissue samples, AAV-injected mouse liver tissue samples, and saline-injected mouse liver tissue samples. Values represent the mean of individual tissue samples and error bars represent standard deviation. Individual data points are shown for each sample. The complete list of SNVs from ANNOVAR analysis is provided as . Summary statistics for SNV calls are in . ( d ) RNA isolated from mouse liver tissue samples was reverse transcribed and amplified with primer sets specific to mouse Gapdh (detected with Cy5), mouse Actb (detected with Cy5.5), and human RAB25 (detected with TEX 615). Ct values were determined by quantitative PCR and are shown below each lane. N.D. = not detected.
Techniques Used: Variant Assay, Isolation, Injection, Standard Deviation, Amplification, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction




Fig. 1 ). The positive and negative predictive value of the reads for pN+ status, associated hypermethylation, read distribution between pN0 and pN+ OSCC, and predictive value of the methylation data are illustrated. P -value for the differential DNA methylation was calculated using the Mann-Whitney-U test. Positive and negative predictive value for the methylation status of all MCs were calculated as follows: OOSCC with a read count of ≥ 3 reads were considered true positives and OOSCC with a count read <3 were considered true negatives. Subsequently, the positive predictive value was then calculated as: (true positive pN+ OOSCC) / (true positive pN+ OOSCC + false positive pN0 OOSCC). Finally, the negative predictive value was calculated as: (true negative pN0 OOSCC) / (true negative pN0 OOSCC + false negative pN+ OOSCC)." width="100%" height="100%">